Home   •   Inbox   •   Archive   •   tags   •   twitter   •   livejournal   •   AO3   •   Theme Credit
July 2014
22
Via   •   Source

It reminds me of the “bike to work” movement. That is also portrayed as white, but in my city more than half of the people on bike are not white. I was once talking to a white activist who was photographing “bike commuters” and had only pictures of white people with the occasional “Black professional” I asked her why she didn’t photograph the delivery people, construction workers etc. … ie. the Black and [Latin@] and Asian people… and she mumbled something about trying to “improve the image of biking” then admitted that she didn’t really see them as part of the “green movement” since they “probably have no choice” –

I was so mad I wanted to quit working on the project she and I were collaborating on.

So, in the same way when people in a poor neighborhood grow food in their yards … it’s just being poor– but when white people do it they are saving the earth or something.

 - comment left on the Racialious blog post “Sustainable Food & Privilege: Why is Green always White (and Male and Upper-Class)” (via meggannn)
July 2014
13
Via   •   Source

thotofficial:

White gays

July 2014
05
Via   •   Source

So number one, Reading Rainbow was not cancelled because it was not effective. Reading Rainbow was the most used television resource in our nation’s classroom. In 2009, it was [cancelled] due to No Child Left Behind. That government policy made a choice between teaching the rudiments of reading and fostering a love of reading. So the idea that I am trying to somehow revive a failed endeavor is bullshit. That’s right. I said it. Bullshit.

July 2014
03
Via   •   Source
datanews:

Thousands of new American citizens will be sworn in across the country at July 4 naturalization ceremonies. Here’s our map showing the foreign-born population by county for Dante Chinni’s Wall Street Journal column on the complicated politics of immigration reform.
Enjoy the long weekend!

datanews:

Thousands of new American citizens will be sworn in across the country at July 4 naturalization ceremonies. Here’s our map showing the foreign-born population by county for Dante Chinni’s Wall Street Journal column on the complicated politics of immigration reform.

Enjoy the long weekend!

July 2014
02
Via   •   Source

iwgregorio:

Here in America in the 21st century, we live in an infuriatingly post-everything world, where racist people know they can’t be seen as racist, where anti-women activists know they can’t be seen as anti-women, and homophobes know they can’t be seen as homophobic. So we lace our words, our actions, our laws with different, thinly veiled excuses. Laws that target black men are instead interpretations of the Second Amendment that permit us to “stand our ground.” Women’s health and safety is put at stake in order to stand by freedom of speech and religion, as long as the religion is Christianity. And to finish off the triumvirate, lesbian books for children are banned not for being about lesbians, but because they include a few curse words.

The Miseducation of Cameron Post by Emily Danforth, published in 2012, was a YA tour de force, a book that older queers wished had been written when they were kids, lauded by numerous high-brow publications for the quality of its writing. It was also nominated for the much-coveted Morris Award, given by the American Library Association each year to the best new voice in YA. This wasn’t just a book that the gays were reading. Everybody was reading it! And loving it!

Then it was banned for “inappropriate language.”

@afterellen is working with a Delaware bookstore, Browseabout Books, to try to get the word out about the CAMERON POST banning.  Anyone can call the store at (302) 226-2665 and order a copy of the book to be given to an interested area reader.

June 2014
30
Via   •   Source

Take boots, for example. [Vimes] earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles.

But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

 -

—Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms (via rascalbot)

This is how it is really expensive to be poor. 

(via everydayworldasproblematic)

June 2014
25
Via   •   Source

aconybell:

The only kind of man who says, “Not all men are assholes,” is an asshole. If you really were a “nice guy,” you’d be saying, “Wow, lots of men are fucking assholes to women. Let’s do something to change that.”

June 2014
25
Via   •   Source

nerdassstyles:

if you were to go into the “girl gang” tag right now, I can guarantee you’d find it filled with pictures of white girls in pastel fighting against the patriarchy. And there’s nothing wrong with wanting to take back feminization! If that’s your preferred aesthetic, use it! But at the same time please know that there’ more appropriate terms for what you’re representing (squad, instead of gang maybe)

because where I grew up, gangs weren’t (and aren’t) something cool that you can just mess around with. They’re not something you can be after school or on the weekends. Gangs post a real threat

When I was 15, I moved to a different state and was shocked to see people wearing shirts in one solid single color. people were able to wear different shoelaces on each shoe and plain white t-shirts were allowed. Where I grew up, even as far back as the 5th grade, these things were a strict part of the “banned” portion of the dress code because of their gang affiliations. I remember days where anyone wearing red, or blue, or with Elmo on it was called to the office for questioning. This was normal and this was gang culture

people in my own family have been hurt and affected by gang violence but yeah, go ahead and glamorize it to get notes on your mixes, go ahead and spray paint “support your local girl gang” on the walls of your white neighborhood

June 2014
22
Via   •   Source
lecoil:

What Pastel Hair Means For Women Of Color. Great feature by Refinery29 with photos by Julia Robbs.

lecoil:

What Pastel Hair Means For Women Of Color. Great feature by Refinery29 with photos by Julia Robbs.

June 2014
19
Via   •   Source

A post for men about creepy men

realsocialskills:

I wrote a post a while back about how some people are very good at getting away with doing intentionally creepy things by passing themselves off as just ~awkward~.

Recently, I noticed a particular pattern that plays out. While creeps can be any gender, there’s a gendered pattern by which creepy men get other men to help them be creepy:

  • A guy runs over the boundaries of women constantly
  • He makes them very uncomfortable and creeped out
  • But he doesn’t do that to guys, and
  • He doesn’t talk to guys about it in an unambiguous way, and
  • When he does it in front of guys, he finds a way to make it look deniable
  • And then some women complain to a man, maybe even a man in charge who is supposed to be responsible for preventing abuse in a space
  • and he has no idea what they are talking about, since he’s never the target or witness
  • And he’s had a lot of pleasant interactions with that guy
  • So he sympathizes with him, and thinks he must mean well but be have trouble with social skills
  • And then takes no action to get him to stop or to protect women
  • And so the group stays a place that is safe for predatory men, but not for the women they target

For example:

  • Mary, Jill, and Susan: Jim, Bob’s been making all of us really uncomfortable. He’s been sitting way too close, making innuendo after everything we say, and making excuses to touch us.
  • Bill: Wow, I’m surprised to hear that. Bob’s a nice guy, but he’s a little awkward. I’m sure he doesn’t mean anything by it. I’m not comfortable accusing him of something so serious from my position of authority.

What went wrong here?

  • Bill assumed that, if Bob was actually doing something wrong, he would have noticed.
  • Bill didn’t think he needed to listen to the women who were telling him about Bob’s creepy actions. He didn’t take seriously the possibility that they were right. 
  • Bill assumed that women who were uncomfortable with Bob must be at fault; that they must be judging him too harshly or not understanding his awkwardness
  • Bill told women that he didn’t think that several women complaining about a guy was sufficient reason to think something was wrong
  • Bill assumed that innocently awkward men should not be confronted about inadvertantly creepy things they do, but rather women should shut up and let them be creepy

A rule of thumb for men:

  • If several women come to you saying that a man is being creepy towards them, assume that they are seeing something you aren’t
  • Listen to them about what they tell you
  • If you like the guy and have no idea what they’re talking about, that means that what he is doing is *not* innocent awkwardness.
  • If it was innocent awkwardness, he wouldn’t know how to hide it from other men
  • Men who are actually just awkward and bad at understanding boundaries also make *other men* uncomfortable
  • If a man is only making women uncomfortable but not men, that probably means he’s doing it on purpose
  • Take that possibility seriously, and listen to what women tell you about men

tl;dr If you are a man, other men in your circle who are nice to you are creepy towards women. Don’t assume that if something was wrong that you would have noticed; creepy men are good at finding the lines of what other men will tolerate. Listen to women. They know better than you do whether a man is being creepy and threatening towards women; if they think something is wrong, listen and find out why. Don’t tolerate give predatory dudes who are nice to you cover to keep hurting women.

June 2014
19
Via   •   Source

In a study of children aged 2-5, parents interrupted their daughters more than their sons, and fathers were more likely to talk simultaneously with their children than mothers were. Jennifer Coates says: “It seems that fathers try to control conversation more than mothers… and both parents try to control conversation more with daughters than with sons. The implicit message to girls is that they are more interruptible and that their right to speak is less than that of boys.”

Girls and boys’ differing understanding of when to talk, when to be quiet, what is polite and so on, has a visible impact on the dynamics of the classroom. Just as men dominate the floor in business meetings, academic conferences and so on, so little boys dominate in the classroom - and little girls let them.

 -

X  (via albinwonderland)

Having gone to an all girls boarding school this was a biiiig shock to me when I arrived at uni - how the boys expected to be getting the floor at all times, how they took ideas that I had offered, expanded on them forever and ever without me ever getting the word back, however much I tried to do so politely, and how they were credited with those ideas in the end. I became known as ‘very dominant’ in class because I refused to let that happen more than once. And by the time I left there were two kinds of people, the ones who considered me ‘more of a boy’ and the ones who thought I was simply an annoying b*tch. While I am just a girl speaking her mind.

(via genderqueenstyles)

June 2014
18
Via   •   Source

genderblinditem:

emma stone and andrew garfield doing their ~awareness celebrity paparazzi walk thing to promote autism speaks….. 

…….

coooooooooool you people are really cool people who are very aware very liberal people who do great things very proud such charity. 

(receipts for why autism speaks is shitty) *that last one is a youtube link

June 2014
15
Via   •   Source

intersectionalityis4lovers:

  • don’t trust men who have to insult other women in order to compliment you
  • a subset of this rule is don’t trust men who say ‘you’re pretty/smart/[adjective] for an indian/asian/[identity group]’
  • or ‘you’re not like other [identity group optional] girls’
June 2014
12
Via   •   Source
humansofnewyork:

A glimpse into the journal of a (quite intelligent) 16 year old girl. Photographed, with permission, in Central Park. 

humansofnewyork:

A glimpse into the journal of a (quite intelligent) 16 year old girl. Photographed, with permission, in Central Park. 

June 2014
11
Via   •   Source

daisydeadhead:true-crime-101:

Some Basic Serial Killer Statistics

  • The USA has 76% of the world’s serial killers.
  • Europe in second, has 17%.  England has produced 28% of the European total; Germany produces 27%, and France produces 13%.
  • California leads in the US with the most Serial Homicide cases that have occured.  Texas, New York, Illinois, and Florida follow shortly behind.
  • Maine has the lowest occurence of serial murders - none.  Hawaii, Montana, North Dakota, Delaware, and Vermont each have had only one case of a serial murder.
  • 84% of American killers are caucasian.
  • 16% are black.
  • Men make up at least 90% of the world wide total of serial killers.
  • 65% of victims are female.
  • 89% of victims are white.
  • 44% of all killers start in their twenties.
  • 26% start in their teens.
  • 24% start in their thirties.
  • Out of all the killers, 86% are heterosexual.

I notice those magic words “serial killers” really piss off the MRAs.  I see why now.